[1]尚庆学,王涛.隔震建筑柔性管线的抗震性能试验研究[J].自然灾害学报,2018,(01):050-60.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2018.0107]
 SHANG Qingxue,WANG Tao.Experimental study on seismic performance of flexible pipelines used in base isolated buildings[J].,2018,(01):050-60.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2018.0107]
点击复制

隔震建筑柔性管线的抗震性能试验研究
分享到:

《自然灾害学报》[ISSN:/CN:23-1324/X]

卷:
期数:
2018年01期
页码:
050-60
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-02-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Experimental study on seismic performance of flexible pipelines used in base isolated buildings
作者:
尚庆学 王涛
中国地震局工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
Author(s):
SHANG Qingxue WANG Tao
Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, CEA, Harbin 150080, China
关键词:
柔性管线隔震建筑损伤指数易损性曲线模型标定
Keywords:
flexible pipelineisolated buildingdamage indexfragility curvemodel calibration
分类号:
X9;TU352
DOI:
10.13577/j.jnd.2018.0107
摘要:
隔震建筑的隔震层在罕遇地震作用时会发生较大的水平位移,这要求穿越隔震层的竖向管线系统必须采用柔性连接以维持建筑的使用功能。尽管相关规范、规程规定了柔性连接管线的构造方式,但其真实的变形能力尚缺乏试验研究。本文对具有不同密封构造(橡胶型、金属型和石棉型)和连接接头(抓斗式和卡套式)的柔性管线进行了循环加载试验,所有试件均预先充水加压至1.0 MPa或2.5 MPa,以密封泄漏、力学指标下降作为判断构件失效的依据。试验表明橡胶密封圈和金属密封圈能够有效地防止柔性管线的泄漏,而采用石棉密封圈的试件泄漏位移远小于另外两种密封圈。抓斗式接头用于柔性管线的连接是可行的,而卡套接头不能提供同等水平的抗震性能。定义了柔性管线损伤极限状态和损伤指数,得到了试验易损性曲线。建立了柔性管线力学模型,利用试验数据对其关键参数进行识别,以性能点力学指标为依据,准确再现了试件抗震性能,为建立整体结构多元模型奠定了基础。
Abstract:
Large horizontal deformation is expected in the base-isolation layer of an isolated building when being caught by a rarely-occurred earthquake, which necessitates a flexible connection of pipelines from the foundation to the superstructure to accommodate such large deformation. Although related design codes stipulate the configuration of flexible pipeline connections,the real deformability and seismic performance are lack of experimental investigation. Three types of seals,namely rubber-based seal,metal-based seal and asbestine-based seal,and two types of connections,i.e.,the grab-type joint and ferrule fitting joint, are tested in this study. All specimens were cyclically tested with the pipes filled with pressurized water, either at 1.0 MPa or 2.5 MPa. The water leakage and the mechanical degradation were taken as the failure of specimens. It was observed that the asbestine-based seal leaked at smaller deformations than the other two types of seals. And it was not easy for the ferrule fitting joint to realize the complete boundary of in-filled liquids. Damage states and damage index of the flexible pipeline are defined based on the test results, together with their seismic fragility curves. Finally, the mechanical model for the flexible pipeline is proposed and the associated parameters are identified from the experimental data. Judged by the forces at specific performance points, the model is able to reproduce the seismic behavior of flexible pipelines accurately, which provides basis of mega model of hospital buildings for seismic performance evaluation.

参考文献/References:

[1] Taghavi S, Miranda E. Response Assessment of Nonstructural Building Elements[R]. Report 2003105, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 2003.
[2] Tian Y, Filiatrault A, Mosqueda G. Seismic response of pressurized fire sprinkler piping systems I:experimental study[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2015, 19(4):649-673.
[3] Ju B S. Seismic Fragility of Piping System[M]. North Carolina State University, 2012.
[4] Martínez, Gabriel E. Sánchez. A comparative study of a piping system subjected to earthquake loads using finite element modeling and analysis.[C]//Proceeding of the 2007 Earthquake Engineering Symposium for Young Researchers, Seattle, WA. 2007.
[5] Goodwin E M, Maragakis EM, Itani A M. Experimental evaluation of the seismic performance of hospital piping subassemblies[R]. Report MCEER-07-0013, 2007.
[6] Hoehler M S, Panagiotou M, Restrepo J I, et al. Performance of suspended pipes and their anchorages during shake table testing of a seven-story building[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2009, 25(1):71-91.
[7] Soroushian S, Zaghi A E, Maragakis E M, et al. Seismic fragility study of fire sprinkler piping systems with grooved fit joints[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 141(6):04014157.
[8] Zhong Z, Aref A, Filiatrault A. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Buried Pipelines Retrofitted with Cured-in-Place Pipe Liner Technology under Near-Fault Ground Motions[C]//Structures Congress 2015. 2015:1903-1914.
[9] 王玉梅, 熊立红, 许卫晓. 芦山7.0级地震医疗建筑震害与启示[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2013, 33(4):44-53. WANG Yumei, XIONG Lihong, XU Weixiao. Seismic damage and damage enlightenment of medical buildings in Lushan MS 7.0 earthquake[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2013, 33(4):44-53. (in Chinese).
[10] Qu Z, Kishiki S, Nakazawa T. Influence of isolation gap size on the collapse performance of seismically base-Isolated buildings[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2013, 29(4):1477-1494.
[11] Nitta Y, Uruyu Mitsuru, Suhara Junji, et al. A study on deformation capacity of pipes between isolated and non-isolated structures[C]//Summaries of Technical Papers of Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan. B-2, Structures Ⅱ, Structural Dynamics Nuclear Power Plants. Architectural Institute of Japan, 1996:1155-1156.
[12] Kato, T., Mizuno, Y., Sasaki, K. An experimental study on piping system with universal expansion joint for base isolated building[C]//Architectural Institute of Japan, 2000:759-760.
[13] Sorace S, Terenzi G. Analysis, testing, design and construction of a base-isolated/supplementally damped building[C]//The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, 2008.
[14] Sorace S, Terenzi G. Analysis and demonstrative application of a base isolation/supplemental damping technology[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(3):775-793.
[15] 03SG610-1建筑结构隔震构造详图[S].北京:中国计划出版社, 2003. 03SG610-1 Construction Details for Seismic Isolation Buidlings[S]. Beijing:China Planning Press, 2003. (in Chinese)
[16] CECS126:2001叠层橡胶支座隔震技术规程[S]. 北京:中国工程建设标准化协会, 2001. CECS126:2001 Technical Specification for Seismic-isolation with Laminated Rubber Bearing Isolators[S]. Beijing:China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization, 2001. (in Chinese)
[17] ASCE 7-10 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures[S]. American Society of Civil Engineers, 2010.
[18] Restrepo J I, Lang A F. Study of loading protocols in light-gauge stud partition walls[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2011, 27(4):1169-1185.
[19] AC156 Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Qualification Testing of Nonstructural Components[S]. International Code Council Evaluation Service.
[20] Retamales R, Mosqueda G, Filiatrault A. Testing protocol for experimental seismic qualification of distributed nonstructural systems[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2011, 27(3):835-856.
[21] 贺思维, 曲哲, 周惠蒙, 等. 非结构构件抗震性能试验方法综述[J]. 土木工程学报, 2017(9):16-27. HE Siwei, QU Zhe, ZHOU Huimeng, et al. State of the practice review of testing nonstructural components in seismic areas[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017(9):16-27. (in Chinese)
[22] FEMA 461 Interim Protocols for Determining Seismic Performance Characteristics of Structural and Nonstructural Components through Laboratory Testing[S]. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2007..
[23] Porter K, Kennedy R, Bachman R. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2007, 23(2):471-489.
[24] Lilliefors H W. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1967, 62(318):399-402.
[25] Open System for Earthquake Simulation Framework (2013) Version 2.4.1.[Z]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
[26] http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Main_Page.[EB/OL]. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-07-26;改回日期:2017-10-09。
基金项目:地震行业科研专项经费(201508023);国家科技支撑项目(2015BAK17B02)和国家国际科技合作专项(2014DFA70950)
作者简介:尚庆学(1993-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事功能性建筑群的地震易损性及功能可恢复性方面的研究.E-mail:qingxueshang@seu.edu.cn
通讯作者:王涛(1977-),男,研究员,博士.主要从事结构抗震试验方法、建筑地震易损性等方面的研究.E-mail:wangtao@iem.ac.cn
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01