[1]王鸾,袁近远,汪云龙,等.基于软土场地实测记录的三种土层地震反应分析方法可靠性研究[J].自然灾害学报,2018,(05):012-19.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2018.0502]
 WANG Luan,YUAN Jinyuan,WANG Yunlong,et al.Reliability comparison of three kinds of seismic response analysis methods for soil layers in soft soil site[J].,2018,(05):012-19.[doi:10.13577/j.jnd.2018.0502]
点击复制

基于软土场地实测记录的三种土层地震反应分析方法可靠性研究
分享到:

《自然灾害学报》[ISSN:/CN:23-1324/X]

卷:
期数:
2018年05期
页码:
012-19
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Reliability comparison of three kinds of seismic response analysis methods for soil layers in soft soil site
作者:
王鸾1 袁近远2 汪云龙1 王克1
1. 中国地震局 工程力学研究所, 中国地震局地震工程与工程振动重点实验室, 黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080;
2. 香港中文大学工程学院, 中国 香港
Author(s):
WANG Luan1 YUAN Jinyuan2 WANG Yunlong1 WANG Ke1
1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration;Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration of China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China;
2. Faculty of Engheering, The Chinese University of Hongkong, Hongkong China
关键词:
传统等效线性化方法SHAKE2000时域非线性方法DEEPSOIL频率一致等效线性化方法SOILQUAKE地震反应分析软土场地
Keywords:
traditional equivalent linearization method SHAKE2000time domain nonlinear method DEEPSOILfrequency-consistent equivalent linearization method SOILQUAKEearthquake response analysissoft soil site
分类号:
TU4;X93
DOI:
10.13577/j.jnd.2018.0502
摘要:
软土场地地震反应计算分析方法是公认难题。以日本KiK-net强震观测台网中所有软土场地井下记录为样本,对传统等效线性化方法SHAKE2000、时域非线性方法DEEPSOIL和频率一致等效线性化方法SOILQUAKE三者在软土场地地震反应分析计算中的可靠性进行对比检验。检验工况包括KiK-net井下台网中地表峰值加速度不小于0.05 g的所有水平软土场地的总计309台次的加速度记录,涉及24个台站,土层厚度28 m~240 m,地表峰值加速度范围0.050 g~0.580 g。对比结果表明:烈度6度和7度偏下(地表PGA在0.12 g以下)的较弱地震动下,对三类、四类和巨厚场地,SOILQUAKE、SHAKE2000和DEEPSOIL三个方法计算结果相差不大,与实际记录较为接近,皆可采用;烈度7度中上以上(地表PGA在0.12 g以上)的较强地震动下,无论是三类、四类和巨厚场地,DEEPSOIL和SHAKE2000计算出的地表PGA和反应谱较实际记录偏小,且随地震动强度增加差距急剧增大,甚至小于井下输入,而SOILQUAKE计算出结果与实际记录基本相当,可体现出软土场地放大作用,也证明了频率一致等效线性化方法的有效性。
Abstract:
Seismic response analysis of soft soil site is a difficult problem in seismic response analysis of soil layer. Using the 309 times records of underground seismic observation of Japanese KiK-net strong motion of network database,the three methods for calculating one-dimensional earthquake response analysis of soil layers in soft sites are verified. One of the methods is SOILQUAKE16 recently developed and the others are SHAKE2000 and DEEPSOIL5.0 used worldwide. The test conditions include seismic acceleration records of all soft soil sites with a surface peak acceleration of not less than 0.05 g in the KiK-net network. The peak ground acceleration of these records belonging to 24 stations range from 0.05 g to 0.580 g. The results indicate that there are similar accuracies of the calculated values by the above three methods under weak ground motion and the calculated values are near to the measured values both in the peak ground acceleration and surface acceleration response spectra. In the moderate and strong ground motion, however, the calculated values by SHAKE2000 and DEEPSOIL5.0 are obviously lower than the measured values and the gap between the calculated ones and the measured ones increase with the increasing of ground motion intensity. By the contrast, the result of peakground acceleration and surface acceleration response spectra by SOILQUAKE16 is close to the measured values, and can reflect the amplification effect of seismic ground motion in soft sites.

参考文献/References:

[1] GB 17741-2005工程场地地震安全性评价技术[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2005. GB 17741-2005 Seismic Safety Assessment Technology for Engineering Sites[S]. Beijing:China Standard Press, 2005. (in Chinese)
[2] 廖振鹏. 地震小区划——理论与实践[M]. 北京:地震出版社, 1989. LIAO Zhenpeng. Seismic Microzonation——Theory and Practice[M]. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1989.(in Chinese)
[3] P B Schnabel, J. Lysmer, H B Seed. SHAKE-A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered sites[R]. Report No. UBC/EERC-72-12, University of California, Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 1972.
[4] Hashash, Youssef M A, Duhee Park. Non-linear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the mississippi embayment[J]. Engineering Geology. 2001, 62(1-3):185-206.
[5] 刘德东,齐文浩,张宇东,等. 现行土层地震反应分析存在的问题[J]. 防灾科技学院学报, 2009, 11(3):34-37. LIU Dedong, QI Wenhao, ZHANG Yudong, et al. Problems existing in current seismic response analysis for soil layers[J]. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 2009, 11(3):34-37. (in Chinese)
[6] Shawn C. Griffiths, Brady R. Cox, Ellen M. Rathje. Challenges associated with site response analyses for the soft soils subjected to high-intensity input ground motions[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2016,85(1-10).
[7] 李小军. 一维土层地震反应线性化计算程序[M]. 地震小区化——理论与实践. 北京:地震出版社, 1989, 250-268. LI Xiaojun. The Soil Seismic Response of One-Dimensional Linear Calculation Program[M]. Seismic Microzonation-Theory and Practice. Beijing:Seismological Press, 1989, 250-268.(in Chinese)
[8] 袁晓铭, 李瑞山, 孙锐. 新一代土层地震反应分析方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(10):95-102+122. YUAN Xiaoming, LI Ruishan, SUN Rui. A new generation method for earthquake response analysis of soil layers[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal. 2016, 49(10):95-102+122. (in Chinese)
[9] 李瑞山. 新一代土层地震反应分析方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨:中国地震局工程力学研究所, 2016. LI Ruishan. Research on a New Generation Technique for Ground Seismic Response Analysis[D]. Harbin:Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, 2016. (in Chinese)
[10] Kik-net强震观测网. Strong-motion seismograph Networks (k-Net, Kik-net)[DB]. http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/.
[11] GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2010. GB50011-2010 Code forSeismic Design of Buildings[S].Beijing:Building Industry Press of China,2010. (in Chinese)
[12] 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 孙静, 等. 常规土类动剪切模量比和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2000, 20(4):133-139. YUAN Xiaoming, SUN Rui, SUN Jing, et al. Laboratory experimental study on dynamic shear modulus ratio and damping ratio of soil[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2000, 20(4):133-139. (in Chinese)
[13] Darendeli M B. Development of a New Family of Normalized Modulus Reduction And Material Damping Curves[D]. The University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
[14] Gardner G, Gardner L W, Gregory A R. Formation velocity and density-the diagnostic basics for stratigraphic traps[J]. Geophysics. 1974, 39(6):770-780.
[15] GB/T 17742-2008中国地震烈度表[S]. 2008. GB/T 17742-2008 The Chinese Seismic Intensity Scale[S]. 2008. (in Chinese)

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-01-18;改回日期:2018-05-07。
基金项目:国家重点研发计划政府间国际科技创新合作重点专项(2016YFE0105500);中央级公益性研究所基本科研业务费专项(2016A02)
作者简介:王鸾(1993-),女,博士研究生,主要从事土动力学和岩土地震工程研究.E-mail:1286290758@qq.com
通讯作者:汪云龙(1985-),男,副研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程、土工测试及地质勘察等方面的研究.E-mail:Wyl_iem@hotmail.com
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01